The Suarez Group and Red Dot Glocks

Advancing/Improving technology and products and trying new concepts has always been one of the things I enjoyed most about working in the firearms industry and competing in the action shooting sports.  There is always room to improve products and make them better.  There are many companies in the firearms industry making and selling products staffed by people who do not really shoot or use the products they sell.  Consequently, little product advancement is seen from them and the products stagnate and do not improve or move in less logical directions.  It is rare for company to have most or all of the staff be serious shooters, whether they be martially oriented, competition oriented, or a mix of the two.

The Suarez Group has always stood out to me as being a company that really bucks the status quo when it comes to the products and ideas it promotes.  Gabe Suarez himself is focused on advancing the art of small arms technology and techniques, and has staffed his company with serious shooters with a wide range of practical experience.  While their focus is on the martial side of shooting, many of the things they are doing appeal to myself as a competitor that prefers to use equipment with practical application and value.  The Suarez Group really grabbed my attention in early 2010 when they began advocating the use of the Trijicon RMR on Glock pistols.

I had been looking for a practical way to use a red dot on a pistol for several years.  The Ironman 3 Gun match I have participated in since 2002 has such a large volume of small targets at longer ranges that must be shot with pistol, it seemed like a natural solution.  I had tried various red dot sights on pistols before and found them all lacking.  They were too large to use in anything but race style holsters, which are a liability for the types of matches I compete in.  Smaller sights were not durable enough.  One sight I tried blinked on and off between shots.  The mounting systems available were clunky.  Even the micro sights available before had less than ideal mounting options.  The biggest problem I had using these systems is without any iron sights in line with the dot, the sights could easily be misaligned and I couldn’t see the dot.

When I saw the first Trijicon RMR equipped Glocks on The Suarez Group’s Warrior Talk forums in early 2010 I immediately knew it was the solution to the problem I was looking for.  The iron sights being in line with the red dot would make the sight alignment a non-issue, the Trijicon RMR was being reported as a very durable sight, in the event it failed the Irons were right there, and the whole package was small enough to fit in a normal duty holster.

I sent my Glock 34 slide off to One Source Tactical Technical Services Division and got it back in April of 2010, modified a Safariland holster, and had just enough time to train with the system before going to the Ironman 3 Gun match in June.  The RMR equipped Glock helped me get a 3rd place finish in Trooper Division that year.  I did indeed find it helpful with regards to accuracy on the numerous small and farther targets, shooting from awkward positions, and making hits while physically stressed.  I used the RMR equipped Glock again in 2011 and 2012 making a lot of pistol shots I do not believe I could have done as easily with an Iron sight pistol if at all.  With few exceptions the RMR equipped Glock usually allowed me to keep up with competitors using sub-machine guns or pistol caliber carbines.

The Suarez Group has expanded their product line since 2010. They are now offering their own complete slide assemblies ready to mount the Trijicon RMR, added several holsters to their product line designed for the RMR equipped pistol, and are now modifying other pistols to accept the RMR.  Trijicon has also advanced RMR itself to include new options like adjustable brightness.

OST-TSD RMR Glock Use and Benefits

With the increasing popularity of optics on pistols and The Suarez Group’s continuing expansion of their product line and promotion of new ideas, I wanted to know more about the thought process and philosophy that goes into the way they seek advancements in firearms technology. The Suarez Group’s General Manager, Tom Cornelius, was kind enough to answer my questions below.


Tom Cornelius on the range

My questions are in Bold, Tom’s answers are in Italics.

What role do you have in deciding what products endorses and sells?

My role concerning product selection is focused on: 1. The quality of the item. 2. It’s utility / value to the customer. 3. Formulating a test protocol to evaluate the product under simulated “real world” circumstances.

What was your background before coming to The Suarez Group, how has it influenced how you evaluate firearms and equipment?

I have served as a Police Officer, Deputy, Corrections Officer, Firearms Trainer, Suarez International Instructor. These experiences have provided me with a focused view of what is needed for an individual to prevail in a fight. Just as there are trends in the world of fashion, there are trends in the realm of firearms training and equipment. Sometimes these “new” products or techniques have real value and move everyone forward in terms of performance. AND sometimes they are nothing more than a trend. At the Suarez Group, we field test all of our mid & high end products before any customer gets their hands on it.

The Suarez Group distinguishes itself from other companies by promoting new technology and platforms others might not consider; Is advancing the art of small arms use and technology part of the philosophy of The Suarez Group?

The Suarez Group is absolutely focused on the pursuit of quality and improving performance in the martial realm. Our philosophy is: “Yesterday’s excellence is tomorrow’s mediocrity.” Technology is something we embrace and study with the idea of improving the products we offer. We have noticed many other organizations that cling to techniques or a certain platforms no matter how much data is out there demonstrating the technique or platform is less than optimum for the end user. We do not blindly embrace any equipment or technique without first testing it. Technology in the firearms / training field is just science being applied to a situation. To ignore advancements because of a lack of vision or ignorance is to cheat your students / customers. The TSD Slide Program is an excellent example of this. We spent two years, a considerable amount of capital and around 100,000 rounds of ammunition in a quest to identify the best “recipe” if you will, of how the optic equipped pistol should evolve. This effort required research in to no less than five different fields of expertise to become a finished product. (Metallurgy, Electronics, Ophthalmology, Kinesiology, Physics) Product research and testing at this level is nothing less than navigating through uncharted waters with raw data as your compass. All the driving forces come from technological advancements.

Why do you feel this is important?

The importance of technology can be something as mundane as a better score for a competitor OR the life saving edge a warfighter needs to prevail in a CQB engagement. The metrics of improved performance are quantified over time. I remember 15-20 years ago when a lot of folks in the firearms training community were ignoring red dot optics and low power scopes for fighting rifles. If a trainer did that today he would be deemed ridiculous by his peers. Those technological improvements in the field of rifle optics have saved untold numbers of lives.

How has teaching classes in addition to selling guns/equipment influenced what The Suarez Group views as effective?

The Suarez Group has the ability to evaluate gear like no other organization. We have a world wide training cadre that can provide evaluations in not only a varied tactical setting, but extreme environmental conditions too.

What methodology of testing does OST/SI use before officially endorsing a piece of equipment or firearm?

The methodology concerning testing products varies. Rifles are typically tested by not only in house staff but contractual staff that can put them in play under extreme environmental conditions. ie arctic, jungle, desert, water borne operations. This thoroughness tends to vet weak performers and shows the top performers. High round counts do become part of this protocol too. In a nutshell, we beat the #!!#// out of everything before it is deemed G2GO. This is not cheap. But it has value to our customers & students!

What set The Suarez Group on the path of the Red Dot Glock?

Well, handguns are the primary tool most people can have with them at all times. It is realistically, the most likely firearm non military individuals will put in to play. While the training & gear industry was attempting to re invent 10,000 different ways to run a pistol class or market a holster, Gabe Suarez began studying handgun performance in gunfights. Not just law enforcement engagements but civilian also. Very few of these gun fights occurred under optimum conditions. To the point, Murphy’s Law was always a factor. Poor lighting, non standard shooting positions, challenging angles, varying distances, etc… etc… Because the pistol has the greatest potential for use, it’s continuing development in terms of combat accuracy under less than perfect conditions is where Gabe chose to align our efforts. An optically equipped pistol that is reliable and has a manageable profile was the answer.

I recall seeing a Kelly McCann video many years before The Suarez Group was offering Red Do Glocks where he was using a Doctor optic on a Glock 19; What advances in technology in the past 10 years have made the red dot equipped pistol a more practical option than it was 10-15 years ago?

Kelly McCann was a true innovator in terms of experimentation of the concept. The Doctor Optic was an early attempt to produce a compact, rugged optic that is compatible with a fighting pistol. It has been our experience that the Doctor Optic is best suited for light to moderate use at best. With the introduction of the Trijicon RMR Series of Red Dot Sights the concept could finally demonstrate the expanded capabilities of a optic equipped fighting pistol.

What makes the Trijicon RMR a better sight for slide mounted use on a pistol than other contemporary options?

The RMR Series is very rugged and functions well in a myriad of environmental conditions. Before Trijicon introduced this excellent product, there was nothing to take the concept where it needed to go. We have evaluated and destroyed just about every optic out there that could be put on a pistol. The RMR was the only thing that held up to consistent hard use.

The Suarez Group appears to have been very influential in popularizing the red dot equipped pistol over the past several years; why has The Suarez Group succeeded in this where others have not?

Our success is based on the pursuit of excellence. Others have attempted to duplicate our efforts but they always fall short. We have seen folks cutting corners on what optics they install, the accuracy of their machining, the compatibility of barrels with their products any many other poorly conceived actions. We focus on quality and the very best materials in our designs. Something a bit sad but becoming a trend, is folks who had slide work done elsewhere approaching us with slides that are messed up and want us to fix the issues from hobbyist machinist’s efforts. Sadly, we cannot help those folks due to liability they created.

OST-TSD offers complete factory Glock slides with match grade barrels, how is this a better option than having a factory slide modified?

I think of our TSD Slide Packages as a system. The TSD Slide is specifically manufactured for optic use from 17-4 heat treated stainless steel. Our barrels are slightly tighter in fit to offer match grade qualities. They are purposely matched for accuracy & fit. The TSD Barrels are suppressor capable and will function with non jacketed ammunition if desired. There is nothing wrong with having a factory slide milled, it’s just not what that item was originally designed for.

OST-TSD is now modifying Sig and S&W M&P slides to accept Trijicon RMRs, What other pistols might be considered in the future?

You never know. We have a staff member that does nothing except explore new platforms and their compatibility with the Trijicon RMR.

10-20 years from now do you think optical sights will be as common on pistols as weaponlights are now?

I don’t think it will be that long… Great ideas have a way of pushing aside skeptics and cheapskates.

What technological advances would you personally like to see in regards to optical sights on handguns?

I can’t say… We are working on that as I write this.

Visit these links to learn more about the products and services offered by the Suarez Group:
www.suarezinternational.com
www.onesourcetactical.com
www.warriortalk.com

Posted in Gear, Industry Insiders, Ironman 3 Gun, Red Dot Glock | Comments Off on The Suarez Group and Red Dot Glocks

Arizona Security Professionals Armed Guard Class

I have been exploring new career opportunities and came across a few that would require an Arizona Department of Public Safety Armed Guard certification. Arizona Security Professionals (ASP) was recommended to me by several people as being the best company to take training from in the Phoenix Metro Area. I took their armed guard class based upon these recommendations. The course is designed for the novice that knows nothing about firearms or the relevant sections of the Arizona Revised Statutes, and the curriculum is mandated by AZ DPS. With those things in mind, the legal portions of the class were still beneficial for someone with my level of experience with firearms.

The class was instructed primarily by ASP Sgt. Gary Hayden, with other ASP personnel dropping in for additional instruction throughout the course. Sgt. Hayden and the other instructors have a lot of practical experience. Relating those experiences when discussing the legal portions of the class made the class more engaging and gave the students a better understanding of the law.

In Arizona security guards operate in the same capacity as any other citizen with no special powers; thus the legal portion was equally applicable to the armed citizen/concealed carrier. It is worth noting, that ASP also offers CCW classes and we were told the curriculum is very similar. I last took a CCW course in 2003, so the refresher was a good thing for me. While the state no longer requires training or qualifications for renewals of CCWs, it is probably a good idea for the armed citizen to do both occasionally. Formal documentation of training and shooting skills can be a good thing, should you find yourself in court.

The shooting qualification was more advanced than that of a CCW class with a total of 50 rounds required at 15-3 yards, including drawing from the holster and reloads. Par times were used for each string, but they were fairly generous. While not particularly challenging for an experienced shooter, getting a formal state recognized demonstration of shooting ability is likely a good thing for the courtroom.


250/250 Points

I would recommend ASPs Armed Guard course to anyone looking to get into that profession. I also think it might be of benefit to property/business owners for educational purposes on use of force, criminal law, and arrest powers in the state of Arizona.

Here’s their promo video:

Posted in Training | Comments Off on Arizona Security Professionals Armed Guard Class

October 2012 Multigun matches


3/9 Open, 6/62 Overall

Rifle: 20″ Palmetto upper with Samson Evo 15″ handguard and Leupold HAMR
Shotgun: 24″ Saiga-12 with Aimpoint M2 in RS Regulate Mount. Note the new tan AGP magazines


1st/41 overall, 1st/5 Open

Rifle: 16″ CMMG with Aimpoint M4S and PWS FSC 556
Pistol: OST-TSD Glock 34 with Trijicon RMR01

Posted in Competitions, Red Dot Glock, SAIGA-12 | Comments Off on October 2012 Multigun matches

September 2012 Multigun Matches

ACTS 9-15-2012

10/46 overall and 3/9 in Open.  With the weather cooling down the physical difficulty has been ramped back up. Agility was definitely a factor at this match.

My Rifle is Century Underfolder AK with US PALM mount for Aimpoint M2. Pistol is my Glock 34 with OST-TSD Modified Slidewith Trijicon RMR

Phoenix Rod and Gun 9-23-2012

1st/6 in Open Division

I’m really enjoying the Leupold HAMR for long range.  Unfortnately the pistol grip on my rifle broke (the screw was holding part of it on while the rest was loose), so I borrowed Don’s TA31 equipped LaRue rifle for the last 100 yard stage.  Both the HAMR and that TA31 have the same magnification and a horse shoe reticle, so that wasn’t a problem.  I’m used to a single stage trigger and the LaRue rifle had a two-stage trigger, which took me a couple shots to get the feel for.

 

Posted in Competitions, Red Dot Glock | Comments Off on September 2012 Multigun Matches

Rio Salado 2012 3 Gun Team Match

The Rio Salado Sportsmans Club hosted their second annual 3 Gun Team Match on 9-8-2012.  Teams consisted of 3 shooters, with only one open division shooter allowed per team, the other 2 shooters could be of any other division.  The stages were relay race style or shooting gallery style with the team working together to neutralize all the targets.

Team Sun Devil defended their title and won the match, followed by Kelly’s Heroes in second place.


My team was 5th place out of 27 teams.
Don used his SCAR-H on stages 1 and 3, Benlli M2 on stages 2 and 4
Karl used his Daniel Defense DMR rife on Stage 1, and cut a swath of destruction with Saiga-12 on the others.
I used my SCAR-L on stage 1, Glock 34 on stages 2 and 3, and Benelli M2 on stage 4

I shot the match twice on another team with my girlfriend (Steff) and another shooter’s wife, Sarah.  While not very experienced, both of them had a good time. The team format is just more fun than shooting stages by yourself.

I used my SCAR-L on stage 1, Benelli M2 on stages 2 and 4, and Glock 34 on stage 3
Steff Used her lighweight blue AR15 on stages 1 and 3, and her Benelli M2 tactical on stage 2 and 4.
Sarah used her AR15 with scope and bipod on stage 1, Glock on stage 2, and Saiga-12 on stages 3 and 4.

Russell’s Bunnies 25/27

To better understand what’s going on in the video here are the stage diagrams and descriptions:

Stage 2: “Flippin’ The Bird” – 2 x SHOTGUN, 1 x PISTOL
Start in shooting boxes, shotguns loaded/safe, pistol loaded/holstered. On start signal, team will engage all targets; steel to fall, clays to break by shotgun fire.

Comments: The flippers on this stage required a pistol shooter to activate them most of the time.

Stage 3: “Smells Like Team Spirit” – 1 x SHOTGUN, 1 x RIFLE, 1 x PISTOL
Start in the team corral, guns loaded and staged in respective containers. On start signal, the shotgunner will engage shotgun targets from shotgun shooting box and then tag the rifleman, then the rifleman will engage rifle targets from rifle shooting box and then tag the pistoleer, then the pistoleer will engage pistol targets from the pistol shooting box; shotgun steel to fall (buckshot or birdshot only), rifle steel to ring and rifle frangibles to break, pistol steel to fall.

Comments: The shotgun targets required buckshot to fall.

Stage 4: “Slug It Out” – 3 x SHOTGUN
Start in shooting boxes, shotguns loaded/safe. On start signal, team will engage all targets; steel to fall (birdshot only), clays to break by gunfire (birdshot only), wood post to be severed (slugs or birdshot only).

Comments: The stick took a lot more slugs than we expected to fall.

Stage 1: “Jack Off (the table)” – 3 x RIFLE
Start in the helicopter, rifles loaded/safe on trays at shooting boxes. On start signal, team will engage all targets; steel to fall, flashers to flash, spinner to spin 360 degrees, rifle jacks to walk off the table. Once targets have been engaged to the team’s satisfaction, the team must get back on board the helicopter before hitting the STOP button.

Comments: The double spinner was much easier with a .308 rifle.  The rifle jacks required multiple good hits to fall off the table.

Posted in Competitions | Comments Off on Rio Salado 2012 3 Gun Team Match

ACTS 8-18-2012

2nd/26 Enhanced, 3rd/50 Overall.  There were a lot of opportunities to incur penalties this month, and I got a few myself, watch the video with comments on for complete explanation.

Arizona ACTS is now allowing muzzle brakes in all divisions, rather than just open.  Accordingly I reconfigured the rifle I normally use for ACTS with a Primary Weapons FSC556.  I prefer having one over a flash hider for competition purposes because it makes getting zero zone hits doing double taps easier.  The FSC556 strikes a good balance between reducing muzzle jump and not making the rifle too loud or increasing muzzle blast to absurd levels.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on ACTS 8-18-2012

July 2012 Multigun Matches

Here’s all the videos of the July 2012 matches in Arizona.  I don’t have much to say about this other than shooting in the summer here isn’t very fun due to the heat, and I tend to get sloppier as my head really isn’t in the game as much.  I’m eager for the temperature to get back under 100 degrees.

Posted in Competitions | Comments Off on July 2012 Multigun Matches

2012 Independence Day Action Rifle Match

The Rio Salado Sportsman’s Club 3 Gun Division hosted the annual Independence Day Action Rifle Match to benefit the Arizona Citizens Defense League.  All proceeds minus range fees went to support AZCDL.  The match had the largest attendance ever with 79 shooters competing in five divisions.  Registration filled up in eight days, with more people still wanting to get in.  A number of participants were not regular Rio Salado practical match attendees and chose to participate because of the rifle only format.

The match consisted of four stages with three being a combination of close range and long range (300+ yards) shooting, and one that was close range only.  Shooting started just after 7AM and wrapped up at about 1PM.  The weather was overcast with light rain for a short period; this kept the temperatures down in the ’90s making the day on the range less draining than in previous years.  The match ended with sandwiches provided by AZCDL and prizes awarded by random drawing to the competitors.

I chose to shoot my Mk17 SCAR-H for this match in Heavy Metal Limited.  I normally wouldn’t shoot in this division in 3 Gun because I don’t have a .45ACP pistol or a pump action shotgun.  I placed 1st/7 shooters in my division, and 17th/79 Overall.  Planning to shoot stages with a 20 round capacity was the main difference I found compared to shooting in Tactical Limited.  Pulling single A zone shots seemed more worthwhile in some cases to make for only one reload on a stage rather than two.  The extra energy of the 7.62mm NATO cartridge was also great at putting the long range LaRue targets down with authority.

Results:

Open (11 Competitors)
1st Kelly Neal
2nd Brian Williamson
3rd Chris Huey

Tac Scope (26 Competitors)
1st Nils Jonasson
2nd Kalani Laker
3rd Josh Manski

Tac Limited (32 Competitors)
1st Mark Stephens
2nd Mike Pannone
3rd Mitch Barlow

Heavy Metal Scope (3 Competitors, so overall results listed too)
1st Gary Mowry 9th overall
2nd Jon Copeland 11th overall
3rd Don Langworthy 23rd overall

Heavy Metal Limited (7 competitors)
1st Russell Phagan
2nd Chris Gotie
3rd Paul Shanks

The Independence Day Action Rifle Match is a great way to celebrate the founding of our country.  Given the level of participation we have seen here in Arizona, it would be a good idea for other states to run similar events to make shooters aware of their local gun rights organizations and generate support for them.

Posted in Competitions, SCAR-H | Comments Off on 2012 Independence Day Action Rifle Match

June 2012 Matches

ACTS

2nd /46 Shooters Over All, 1st/16 Open

I used my AK underfolder I won from East Valley Class 3 this month.  I added an Aimpoint M2 in Midwest Industries Mount.  I don’t really care for the AK underfolder stock, but with the Aimpoint in place I don’t have to jam my face down on the stock so hard to use the sights.  Adding a red dot to anything makes it much easier to use effectively, and this AK was no exception.  I placed surprisingly well with it, in part I think to using the Saiga-12 so much recently with the sights and operating controls being similar.

Phoenix Rod and Gun 3 Gun

I used my SCAR-H in a match for the first time in Tactical Limited with an Aimpoint M4.  My scores on the rifle stages were on par with other shooters using AR15s.  So again I don’t feel that using this particular 7.62mm platform is noticeably more difficult than using an AR15 carbine.

Posted in Competitions, SCAR-H | Comments Off on June 2012 Matches

Ironman 3 Gun 2012-Videos and Report

I attended the 2012 Ironman 3 Gun Match in Parma, ID June 3rd-5th, competing in Trooper Division.  Ironman sets itself apart from other 3 gun matches with its high round count and long stages; it is roughly triple the round count of other major events.  Trooper is unlimited in terms of equipment restrictions; there are none, but competitors must carry all their gear from stage to stage on their person.  You can see all the equipment I brought for the 2012 match here.

The match was well organized and ran efficiently.  Shooting started at 7AM and we were generally done shooting before 7PM with two stages before lunch, and 2 more after lunch on days 1 and 2.  Day 3 left us with 2 stages before lunch and one after lunch then awards/prizes.  The weather in Parma, ID is very erratic and competitors need to bring clothing to deal with anything from freezing rain to temperatures in the high 90s.  The second day of the match got into the high 90s, but at the end of the day storms rolled through with 45+mph winds that lowered temperatures dramatically and caused the match to shut down early (too many targets blowing over).  The last day of the match was in the 50s with constant rain and wind.  Despite the bad weather, the match continued on schedule.

Trooper Victories and Casualties

Trooper division had more participation than ever with at least 31 competitors starting in the division.  Trooper gets bigger every year with more highly skilled competitors.  As one of the founders of Trooper, this is something I am glad to see even though it means my personal chances of placing high are reduced.  Competing against the best is one of the best things about the sport. Ben Fortin dominated Trooper division winning first place and high military category.  He was followed by Travis Gibson in second Sean Smith in third.  Complete match results are posted online here.  I placed 6th, which is better than I expected given the level of competition at the match and some of the equipment issues I had (described below).

Several troopers were lost due to disqualifications for various reasons; including dropped guns or abandoning a gun that was still loaded with the safety off.  Ironman is a marathon, not a sprint;  It is well worth it to slow down slightly to make sure you do everything safely and make it through the entire match.  Equipment problems cause attrition even amongst the best competitors.  Iian Harrison, who has regularly placed in the top 3, unfortunately had to drop out of Trooper and move to Open division when his Saiga-12’s fire control became inoperable, and he did not have spare parts or a spare Saiga-12 carried with him.  Shotgun breakages are the number one reason why competitors have had to drop out of Trooper over the years.  Another competitor on my squad had the floating dust cover on his Saiga-12 break off inside the action and prevent it from cycling.  I remove these from my guns due to this possibility and it also allows spent casings more room to eject.  I was able to coach him through field stripping his gun on the clock and getting the debris out and the gun back into action.

Videos

I used my vio POV HD for most of the stages this year.  Overall I liked used it and the quality of the video.  I did miss recording two of the stages with it though, so stages 2 and 10 are low res substitutes.  Watch the videos below with captions/annotations on as I explain whats going on during the stages.  If you have not attended an Ironman watch them all to get a good idea of what is in store for you at the match.

Stage 1

Stage 2

Stage 3

Stage 4

Stage 5

Stage 6

Stage 7

Stage 8

Stage 9

Stage 10 (my camera didn’t record this one, so here is Don’s run)

Stage 11

Ammo Expended

Pistol Rifle Shot Slug Buck
Minimums 328 300 225 61 0
Ammo taken 800 800 350 105 30
Ammo left over 339 252 89 20 30
Ammo Expended 461 548* 261 85 0**

*I had to reshoot Stage 10, they called the match due to weather while I was shooting the stage, so I shot more rifle than I would have otherwise.
**No buckshot required or allowed on most stages this year

I took enough ammo so that I didn’t worry about running out, and not so much that it was overly burdensome to carry.  Shooters considering participating in Trooper should consider their hit ratio at local matches and use that to determine how much extra ammo to take.

Self-Analysis

After each Ironman match I always analyze what I need to work on for next year.  The biggest thing I did wrong this year was not use the same set of equipment for 3-4 months for all local level matches prior to going to Ironman.  In years past I have done this, and not only does it make me more comfortable and familiar with everything I am using, if there is going to be a problem I can identify it earlier.  I did not follow this practice this year because until the end of April I was preparing for the Tiger Valley team match and used different equipment partly due to rules for that match, and partly based on the problems/conditions faced in that competition.  It’s hard to prepare optimally for two major matches so close together.

Equipment Issues

1) Slug Accuracy.

My slug accuracy started out bad and got worse as the match progressed.  From the bench sighting in the best I got was a 5″ group at 50 yards.  I thought this was good enough given that we normally shoot at large steel plates and the smallest slug targets are 10″ plates at the match.   It ended up not being good enough.  I wasted a lot of time and ammo on slug double spinners at 50-70 yards.  The double spinner has a 8″ plate on top and 10″ plate on the bottom.  It must rotate 360 or a 60 second penalty is incurred.  Slugs normally rotate it in 2 hits, but I had to expend 10-15 shots on many to get my hits.  By the end of the match my slugs were flying so erratically hitting the 18″ steel plates at 75 yards was a challenge.  I pulled my choke off the end of the barrel when I got home and found a large amount of lead build up at the end of the barrel in the transition between the choke

I zeroed with slugs again after removing the chokes and the groups are now much better with the slugs touching or almost touching.

2) Primary rifle not reliable.

The primary rifle I intended to use had less than 1000 rounds through it when I took it to Ironman 2012.  It had proven accurate and reliable at two local matches.  The first stage of Ironman I had multiple failures to feed the next cartidge.  The bolt fully extracted and ejected the spent casing, but would not chamber the next cartridge. With this being an intermittent malfunction, it was hard to diagnose, but I believe it was primarily from using a buffer that was too heavy with PMC .223 ammo which is not as hot as other .223 or 5.56mm loads.  Another competitor on my squad experienced the same malfunction with the same ammo and buffer combo in his rifle, also intermittent.  His rifle also ran reliably in AZ but not so up in ID.   Fortunately I brought a spare rifle and used it for the rest of the match and it ran flawlessly.  At the very end of the match I loaned my back up rifle to a Tac-Limited shooter whose rifle broke at the start of a stage and it ran fine for him too.  I installed a lighter buffer when I got home and the primary rifle now runs reliably.

3) Saiga-12 feeding device malfunctions

My MD Arms drum malfunctioned on the first two stages, so I ditched it.  The spring likely needs to be wound tighter.  I had two malfunctions with my standard 10 round magazines due to weak springs; I’ve been using the same mags for 4-5 years and should have replaced the springs a while ago.  The gun itself was reliable, this is the first time I’ve had zero malfunctions that were the fault of the gun itself with the Saiga-12 at Ironman.

Things to do differently next year…

1) More training, more exercise.

This year was the least effort I have put into preparing for the match in a long time and while I still placed reasonably well, I was not happy with myself for how I did on several of the stages.

2) Bring a Pistol Caliber Carbine.

Troopers can use Pistol Caliber Carbines instead of rifle and/or pistol on many stages.  There were a lot more opportunities to use them to great effect this year.  I had brought one a couple years in the past, but after getting my red dot Glock ended up not using one.  This year the advantages of the PCC were obvious as several competitors on my squad used them to great effect; particularly on double spinners.  They could get 3-4 hits on the plates in the same time it took me to get 2.

3) Bring a .308 rifle

A .308 is definitely not required, but I feel that it may be an advantage or help solve particular shooting problems.  The rifle double spinners and dueling trees were handled much more easily by the competitors with .308s that I witnessed.  There was not much close range rifle hosing where a .308 would have been a disadvantage, particularly when I could have used a 9mm carbine on those portions.  Trying different combinations of equipment is one of the things that I find intellectually stimulating about competing.

The Ironman 3 Gun is a one of a kind competition shooting event.  Every competitive shooter should go at least once.  It gives me something to look forward to every year and focus my efforts towards self improvement and trying new types of firearms and shooting technology.  If you’re planning on going to Ironman 2013, or even 2014 the time to start getting ready is now.

Posted in Competitions, Ironman 3 Gun | Comments Off on Ironman 3 Gun 2012-Videos and Report